They had already done the “right” thing during the strike on the big 3 - they raised the pay rate and benefits packages without being unionized,so what exactly did they accomplish by becoming union other then to drop their pay rate by now having to pay dues ?
The unions won already if it was about the workers during the strike,so what is it,the workers are not allowed to gain unless they give their kickback to the unions?
The union is no different then the evil companies,profiting off the backs of the workers.
Why did they need to spend $40 million hard earned workers dollars to accomplish something they had already accomplished?
How long before Taft-Hartley act kicks in?
The manufacturers in the south actually have RTW imbedded into their incentive package when they located there originally,you are talking about states that put up 100s of millions ,it’s not going to be a walk in the park or cheap for the unions to try and unionize those factories.
The union is a business no different then any other business,expecting a ROI,but they make millions in profit without actually building anything,their product is brokering people.
We’re all fed up with seeing the rich get richer,” Mr. Fain declared recently.
His salary jumped from $160k a year to $347k a year which puts him in the top 5% of earners in Indiana ,that does not include the perks ,so if the rich are not supposed to get richer based on performance,why was he exempt from that formula ?
Should he not make the salary equal to those he represents?
Bookmarks