Well, first, you need to stop confusing a developer's motivation [[the ability to profit by engaging in a project in the present) versus an owner's motivation [[maintaining long-term value). In other words, just because John Ferchill can't make the numbers work in 2009, doesn't mean the building has zero value to the City of Detroit in the long-term.
You have foundations and a superstructure in place already, which cost a LOT of time and money to design and construct from scratch. Never mind the embodied energy in those components. Thus, there is no possible way that demolition will lead to redevelopment, as George Jackson likes to claim. If the numbers don't work for a repair and renovation, they're not going to work when you throw the costs of new foundations and superstructure into the mix [[as well as demolition costs)--at minimum, that's a solid 10% of the construction costs of a new building, which can easily break a project.
I seriously doubt that the Book-Cadillac--a far larger and more complex project--could be made to work under current conditions. But recognizing that we're in a financial trough, you wait. When market conditions improve, there may be a developer who can plug that $10 million gap with his own money. Tax increment financing may make more sense. You don't know, and this hasn't been considered by DEGC. All DEGC is looking at is this ONE blip in time. They're not one bit concerned about long-term value.
It doesn't help that the City of Detroit is one of the most neglectful landlords in the city. They haven't taken care of the Lafayette Building since day one, and now they're using their abuse of their own property as an excuse to spend good money on a bad long-term investment. It's shocking that they can morph their own laziness into still more laziness.
And the claims of redevelopment are specious, at best. If any one vacant lot is going to be redeveloped in Detroit, it's going to be the Hudson's site, due to its location and the fact that it already has paid-for foundations and parking on-site. Until that site is constructed upon, there is no hope for any of the other vacant lots. Adding one more to the mix isn't going to change a damned thing, other than make Detroit a far uglier place. NO SANE PERSON IS GOING TO LIVE OR OPEN A BUSINESS IN THUNDERDOME.
So, right now, the simple "#2 answer" is "you wait". You wait until market conditions change, and you find ways to create demand for space downtown. If DEGC wants to work on "economic growth", they need to be pushing rail transit downtown in order to lower the cost hurdles of building projects [[i.e. parking) downtown.
In the real world, you simply don't throw away millions of dollars at something that will never pay back the principle. That's called a "bad investment".
Bookmarks