Which article are you talking about? Your link opens to an index page.
Without having read the article, I gotta say that your headline is most likely wishful thinking on the part of Salon.com's [[normally) far-left writers.
Which article are you talking about? Your link opens to an index page.
Without having read the article, I gotta say that your headline is most likely wishful thinking on the part of Salon.com's [[normally) far-left writers.
are you joking? Salon.com doesn't even come close to "far-left." Michael Lind, self-declared former neo-con included, are very centrist.
the "death of intellectual conservatism" has been trumpeted before -- by the likes of AuH2O and Buckley [[Buckley, far more even-toned than his modern counterparts, nevertheless often reduced his arguments to the same ad-hominem attacks and other argumentative falacies on which they rely)
I'm sorry, I was gonna respond to this post..but I keep getting to the "Salon.com doesn't even come close to "far-left." part and spewing coffee out my nose from the uncontrollable laughter..since I can't justify the expense of another keyboard, I'll pass.are you joking? Salon.com doesn't even come close to "far-left." Michael Lind, self-declared former neo-con included, are very centrist.
the "death of intellectual conservatism" has been trumpeted before -- by the likes of AuH2O and Buckley [[Buckley, far more even-toned than his modern counterparts, nevertheless often reduced his arguments to the same ad-hominem attacks and other argumentative falacies on which they rely)
|
Bookmarks